[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"gxw-site-config":3,"\u002Finternal_link\u002Flist:{\"platform\":\"pc\",\"lang\":\"zh_tw\"}":19,"\u002Farticle\u002Fdetail:{\"id\":1000795,\"lang\":\"zh_tw\",\"type\":\"article\"}":58},{"code":4,"msg":5,"time":6,"data":7},1,"ok","1793107060",{"lang":8,"title":9,"keywords":10,"description":11,"backend_title":12,"maintenance":13,"mourning":13,"copyright":14,"logos":15,"app_launch_title_image":17,"stats_code":18},"zh_tw","LGBTQ News—讓多元被看見","同性,同志,酷兒,新聞,同性戀,雙性戀,跨性別,Gay,Lesbian,LGBT","LGBTQ News（創立於2025年3月），致力於 24 小時追蹤並報導全球 LGBTQ+ 動態，為全球多元人群提供最及時全面的專業資訊內容。","LGBTQ News",false,"© 2026 LGBTQ News",{"pc_header":16,"pc_footer":16,"h5":16},"\u002Fuploads\u002F20260731\u002Fda592237fc0c484ccfc69f81c30d4d5d.png","","\u003C!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->\r\n\u003Cscript async src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.googletagmanager.com\u002Fgtag\u002Fjs?id=G-C5JV1NRD6G\">\u003C\u002Fscript>\r\n\u003Cscript>\r\nwindow.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];\r\nfunction gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}\r\ngtag('js', new Date());\r\ngtag('config', 'G-C5JV1NRD6G');\r\n\u003C\u002Fscript>",{"list":20},[21,26,29,32,35,38,41,44,47,50,53,56],{"id":22,"keyword":23,"url":24,"target_platform":25},24,"LGBTQ","https:\u002F\u002Fgayxw.com","all",{"id":27,"keyword":28,"url":24,"target_platform":25},23,"多元時報",{"id":30,"keyword":31,"url":24,"target_platform":25},22,"LGBT",{"id":33,"keyword":34,"url":24,"target_platform":25},21,"Lesbian",{"id":36,"keyword":37,"url":24,"target_platform":25},7,"跨性別",{"id":39,"keyword":40,"url":24,"target_platform":25},8,"Gay",{"id":42,"keyword":43,"url":24,"target_platform":25},6,"雙性戀",{"id":45,"keyword":46,"url":24,"target_platform":25},5,"同性戀",{"id":48,"keyword":49,"url":24,"target_platform":25},4,"新聞",{"id":51,"keyword":52,"url":24,"target_platform":25},3,"酷兒",{"id":54,"keyword":55,"url":24,"target_platform":25},2,"同志",{"id":4,"keyword":57,"url":24,"target_platform":25},"同性",{"id":59,"lanmu_id":60,"tag_ids":61,"type":62,"title":63,"summary":64,"cover":65,"cover_alt":66,"og_image":17,"video_url":17,"video_poster":17,"duration":67,"author":17,"source":17,"source_url":17,"is_reprint":67,"view_count":45,"like_count":67,"publish_time":68,"seo":66,"attrs":69,"images":70,"requested_lang":8,"actual_lang":8,"fallback_used":13,"content":71,"voice":17,"lanmu_name":72,"lanmu_code":73,"tag_names":74},1000795,9,"7","article","英國上訴法院將就工作場所性別指引舉行聽證","2026年10月，英國英格蘭及威爾斯上訴法院裁定，就三名原告挑戰平等與人權委員會工作場所性別空間臨時指引的上訴許可舉行口頭聽證，擬於年內開庭審理以釐清職場權益規範。","\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp",null,0,1792223545,{"voice":17,"share_cover_mobile":17},"[\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp\"]","\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp\" alt=\"法庭法槌\" style=\"max-width:100%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;color:#999999;\">該圖與本文無關，圖來源：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pexels.com\u002Fphoto\u002Fjudge-s-gavel-in-courtroom-setting-37726687\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">SHOX ART\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>2026年10月中旬，英國英格蘭及威爾斯上訴法院正式發布法庭命令，決定就三名個人原告挑戰英國平等與人權委員會（Equality and Human Rights Commission，簡稱 EHRC）臨時指引合法性的上訴許可申請舉行口頭聽證。根據上訴法院大法官安德魯斯（Lady Justice Andrews）簽署的審理指令，該聽證會將在切實可行的情況下於2026年年底前開庭審理。此項裁定意味著英國司法體系將進一步審查法定機構關於工作場所單一性別設施指導意見的適法性。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>本案起因於平等與人權委員會此前出台的臨時指導意見，該指引主張工作場所的衛生間及更衣設施應基於生理性別進行劃分。在公益法律組織善法項目（Good Law Project）的支持下，三名當事人對該指引提起司法審查，但英國高等法院於2026年2月作出初審裁決駁回了訴求。原告方在上訴申請中指出，高等法院對英國工作場所健康與安全法規的解釋存在法律適用錯誤，實質上造成了排斥性後果，且未能合理權衡歐洲人權法框架下的公民隱私權與有尊嚴勞動的基本保障。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>在最新程序處置中，上訴法院雖然駁回了善法項目以機構名義參與上訴的訴願資格申請，但全面准許三名個人原告進入口頭聽證程序。針對主審法官認為爭議或已被新版業務守則取代的初步觀點，原告代理律師團隊反駁指出，新守則僅涉及公共服務提供者、公共職能部門及社會團體，而本案核心爭端聚焦於受勞動健康法規管轄的工作場所內部設施，相關矛盾依然切實存在。善法項目性少數權益負責人傑斯·奧索姆森（Jess O’Thomson）公開表示，雇主在職場中處於強勢地位，強行將當事人隔離至第三方空間不僅構成歧視，更對員工隱私權和生計穩定帶來直接風險。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>分析指出，此舉被視為英國圍繞單一性別空間界定與性少數勞動權益司法博弈的關鍵節點。隨著《2010年平等法案》在實際執行中面臨生理性別定義與性別認同保護條款的持續拉鋸，工作場所基本衛生設施的准入規範已成為全英關注的法律焦點。原告方已明確表示，若國內上訴程序未能糾正相關指引，案件將依法上訴至歐洲人權法院，此案的最終司法定性將對英國數萬家雇主的勞動合規指引與反歧視標準產生深遠制度影響。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:right;\">歐洲編輯部：盧卡斯·巴克爾\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">來源：綜合英國英格蘭及威爾斯上訴法院、英國高等法院及 Good Law Project 通報\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>資料來源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英國高等法院司法審查判決檔案（Judgments - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, [2026] EWHC 279 (Admin)）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.judiciary.uk\u002Fjudgments\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.judiciary.uk\u002Fjudgments\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英國平等與人權委員會單一性別設施業務指南（Equality and Human Rights Commission - Guidance on Single-Sex Spaces）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.equalityhumanrights.com\u002Fen\u002Fguidance\u002Fsingle-sex-spaces\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.equalityhumanrights.com\u002Fen\u002Fguidance\u002Fsingle-sex-spaces\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英國國家法律資料庫《2010年平等法案》（Legislation.gov.uk - Equality Act 2010）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.legislation.gov.uk\u002Fukpga\u002F2010\u002F15\u002Fcontents\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.legislation.gov.uk\u002Fukpga\u002F2010\u002F15\u002Fcontents\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n","歐洲","lanmu_9",{"7":75},"焦點"]