Italy University Professor Employment Dismissal Case Ruled in Plaintiff's Favour

Ruggero Freddi

Career Transition and Identity Disclosure Issues

Ruggero Freddi was born in Italy and relocated to the United States during his youth. Operating under the professional name Carlo Masi, he engaged in adult entertainment work with prominent production company Colt Studios, accumulating substantial industry recognition. In 2013, he voluntarily withdrew from the industry and returned to Italy to pursue alternative life direction.

Upon returning to Italy, Freddi committed himself to academic pursuits. He obtained master's degrees in both computer engineering and mathematics, subsequently pursuing doctoral studies in engineering electromagnetics and nanoscience. In 2017, he secured an instructor position at Rome's First University engineering faculty, teaching undergraduate mathematics analysis courses.

Regarding historical non-disclosure, Freddi stated during media interviews that he never deliberately concealed his past; rather, his prior entertainment work fell outside categories requiring mandatory disclosure during university employment applications. He forthrightly acknowledged this history without apologizing for earlier professional choices.


Identity Exposure and Workplace Discrimination

The pivotal moment occurred in 2017. Following Freddi's publication of a fitness video on social media, a student recognised him. Substantial archived materials subsequently circulated through campus student communities, resulting in complete public exposure. Ensuing media attention and campus controversy ensued.

Post-exposure, Freddi's workplace environment underwent dramatic transformation. He subsequently recalled that from the moment of exposure, the work environment became perceptibly oppressive. Colleague attitudes shifted noticeably; pervasive bias emerged, and numerous work matters encountered unexplained obstacles.

In 2019, university administration issued dismissal notification without formal justification or advance communication, refusing to remunerate completed instructional hours. The university's actions clearly targeted his prior employment history.


Judicial Decision and Rights Protection

Following dismissal, Freddi initiated legal proceedings. Spanning three years, the case concluded on January 24, 2023, with the court determining the university's dismissal lacked legitimate justification. The court ordered the university to provide outstanding compensation and damages.

The ruling conveyed explicit legal messaging: individuals cannot be deprived of current employment solely because of lawful work undertaken years previously. The court's determination substantiated Freddi's assertion—professional development should not experience permanent stigmatisation based on early life choices.

Following case resolution, Freddi reflected that individuals progress forward and undergo change. One cannot fixate a person's life segment as their permanent definition. This case provided society significant opportunity for reflection: evaluating adults should emphasise current capability, character, and demonstrated performance rather than perpetually revisiting historical episodes.


European Editorial Office: John