[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"gxw-site-config":3,"\u002Finternal_link\u002Flist:{\"platform\":\"pc\",\"lang\":\"zh_cn\"}":19,"\u002Farticle\u002Fdetail:{\"id\":1000851,\"lang\":\"zh_cn\",\"type\":\"article\"}":58},{"code":4,"msg":5,"time":6,"data":7},1,"ok","1793100570",{"lang":8,"title":9,"keywords":10,"description":11,"backend_title":12,"maintenance":13,"mourning":13,"copyright":14,"logos":15,"app_launch_title_image":17,"stats_code":18},"zh_cn","LGBTQ News — 让多元被看见","同性,同志,酷儿,新闻,同性恋,双性恋,跨性别,Gay,Lesbian,LGBT","LGBTQ News（创立于2025年3月），致力于 24 小时追踪并报道全球LGBTQ+动态，为全球多元人群提供最及时全面的专业资讯内容。","LGBTQ News",false,"© 2026 LGBTQ News",{"pc_header":16,"pc_footer":16,"h5":16},"\u002Fuploads\u002F20260731\u002Fda592237fc0c484ccfc69f81c30d4d5d.png","","\u003C!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->\r\n\u003Cscript async src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.googletagmanager.com\u002Fgtag\u002Fjs?id=G-C5JV1NRD6G\">\u003C\u002Fscript>\r\n\u003Cscript>\r\nwindow.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];\r\nfunction gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}\r\ngtag('js', new Date());\r\ngtag('config', 'G-C5JV1NRD6G');\r\n\u003C\u002Fscript>",{"list":20},[21,26,29,32,35,38,41,44,47,50,53,56],{"id":22,"keyword":23,"url":24,"target_platform":25},24,"LGBTQ","https:\u002F\u002Fgayxw.com","all",{"id":27,"keyword":28,"url":24,"target_platform":25},23,"多元时报",{"id":30,"keyword":31,"url":24,"target_platform":25},22,"LGBT",{"id":33,"keyword":34,"url":24,"target_platform":25},21,"Lesbian",{"id":36,"keyword":37,"url":24,"target_platform":25},7,"跨性别",{"id":39,"keyword":40,"url":24,"target_platform":25},8,"Gay",{"id":42,"keyword":43,"url":24,"target_platform":25},6,"双性恋",{"id":45,"keyword":46,"url":24,"target_platform":25},5,"同性恋",{"id":48,"keyword":49,"url":24,"target_platform":25},4,"新闻",{"id":51,"keyword":52,"url":24,"target_platform":25},3,"酷儿",{"id":54,"keyword":55,"url":24,"target_platform":25},2,"同志",{"id":4,"keyword":57,"url":24,"target_platform":25},"同性",{"id":59,"lanmu_id":60,"tag_ids":61,"type":62,"title":63,"summary":64,"cover":65,"cover_alt":66,"og_image":17,"video_url":17,"video_poster":17,"duration":67,"author":17,"source":17,"source_url":17,"is_reprint":67,"view_count":54,"like_count":67,"publish_time":68,"seo":66,"attrs":69,"images":70,"requested_lang":8,"actual_lang":8,"fallback_used":13,"content":71,"voice":17,"lanmu_name":72,"lanmu_code":73,"tag_names":74},1000851,11,"2","article","美国最高法院驳回推翻同性婚姻裁决上诉","2026年，美国最高法院未予置评直接驳回肯塔基州前书记官金·戴维斯就同性婚姻合法化裁决提起的上诉，维持下级法院36万美元赔偿判令，捍卫全美婚姻平等先例。","\u002Fuploads\u002F20261025\u002Fd28bd71994371ad564a217024eb67ffa.webp",null,0,1792937433,{"voice":17,"share_cover_mobile":17},"[\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261025\u002Fd28bd71994371ad564a217024eb67ffa.webp\"]","\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261025\u002Fd28bd71994371ad564a217024eb67ffa.webp\" alt=\"美国最高法院大楼正面\" style=\"width:70%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color:#999999;\">该图与本文无关，图来源：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pexels.com\u002Fphoto\u002Ffront-view-of-the-united-states-supreme-court-building-36984937\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">Mark Stebnicki\u003C\u002Fa>（Pexels）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>美国联邦最高法院正式驳回了一项要求推翻全美同性婚姻合法化历史性裁决的上诉申请。全体大法官在未附带任何评议意见的情况下，正式拒绝审理肯塔基州罗恩县前法庭书记官金·戴维斯（Kim Davis）提出的调卷上诉。戴维斯此前因在2015年最高法院就“奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案”（Obergefell v. Hodges）作出宪法判决后蓄意拒绝向同性伴侣签发结婚证书，被下级联邦法院判令承担36万美元的民事侵权赔偿金与律师诉讼费用。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>在漫长的上诉司法程序中，戴维斯的辩护律师反复援引保守派大法官克拉伦斯·托马斯（Clarence Thomas）的公开言论，后者是九位现任大法官中唯一公开呼吁废除同性婚姻合法化判例的成员。然而，托马斯的激进立场未能在当前最高法院保守派多数席位中形成合力。同属2015年持异议者的首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨长期对此保持司法沉默，大法官萨缪尔·阿利托虽曾抨击该判决，但已明确表示不主张予以推翻；而后入职的埃米·科尼·巴雷特大法官则强调，鉴于广大公民已基于该判例组建家庭并抚育子女，其形成的深远法律信赖利益与2022年推翻堕胎权的判决存在本质区别。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>最高法院拒绝介入的决定获得了美国民权阵营的高度赞扬。美国最大性少数权益组织“人权战线”（Human Rights Campaign）主席凯利·罗宾逊（Kelley Robinson）在声明中指出，最高法院的这一司法裁定有力表明，任何公职人员企图以个人宗教信仰为由践踏他人宪法权利的行径，都必须依法承担切实的法律责任。回顾案件始末，戴维斯曾因藐视联邦法院发证命令于2015年9月被直接收监羁押，直至其下属代为发证后方获释放，肯塔基州议会随后更专门通过法案将县书记官姓名从全州结婚证书表格中完全删除。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>法律界分析指出，最高法院此次驳回上诉为全美婚姻平等制度筑牢了关键的司法确定性。这一裁定表明，即便在联邦最高司法机构经历深层次意识形态重构的背景下，支撑公民日常生活与家庭法制的实体性信赖利益依然受到宪法秩序的强力庇护。司法机关拒绝重新开启宪法诉讼通道，不仅有效遏制了个别极端保守势力企图将宗教信条绝对化并凌驾于世俗公权力之上的法制倒退尝试，更确立了公职人员依法履职、保障公民法定平等权不可动摇的法治底线。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:right;\">北美洲编辑部：利亚姆·史密斯\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:left;\">来源：综合美联社（AP）华盛顿电讯报道\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:left;\">资料来源\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:left;\">\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.supremecourt.gov\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">美国联邦最高法院官方案卷门户（Supreme Court of the United States）\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:left;\">\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.law.cornell.edu\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">康奈尔大学法律信息学会宪法与判例数据库（LII - Obergefell v. Hodges）\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:left;\">\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Flegislature.ky.gov\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">肯塔基州议会立法档案官方网站（Kentucky General Assembly）\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>","北美洲","lanmu_11",{"2":75},"头条"]