[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"gxw-site-config":3,"\u002Finternal_link\u002Flist:{\"platform\":\"pc\",\"lang\":\"zh_cn\"}":19,"\u002Farticle\u002Fdetail:{\"id\":1000795,\"lang\":\"zh_cn\",\"type\":\"article\"}":58},{"code":4,"msg":5,"time":6,"data":7},1,"ok","1793107167",{"lang":8,"title":9,"keywords":10,"description":11,"backend_title":12,"maintenance":13,"mourning":13,"copyright":14,"logos":15,"app_launch_title_image":17,"stats_code":18},"zh_cn","LGBTQ News — 让多元被看见","同性,同志,酷儿,新闻,同性恋,双性恋,跨性别,Gay,Lesbian,LGBT","LGBTQ News（创立于2025年3月），致力于 24 小时追踪并报道全球LGBTQ+动态，为全球多元人群提供最及时全面的专业资讯内容。","LGBTQ News",false,"© 2026 LGBTQ News",{"pc_header":16,"pc_footer":16,"h5":16},"\u002Fuploads\u002F20260731\u002Fda592237fc0c484ccfc69f81c30d4d5d.png","","\u003C!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->\r\n\u003Cscript async src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.googletagmanager.com\u002Fgtag\u002Fjs?id=G-C5JV1NRD6G\">\u003C\u002Fscript>\r\n\u003Cscript>\r\nwindow.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];\r\nfunction gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}\r\ngtag('js', new Date());\r\ngtag('config', 'G-C5JV1NRD6G');\r\n\u003C\u002Fscript>",{"list":20},[21,26,29,32,35,38,41,44,47,50,53,56],{"id":22,"keyword":23,"url":24,"target_platform":25},24,"LGBTQ","https:\u002F\u002Fgayxw.com","all",{"id":27,"keyword":28,"url":24,"target_platform":25},23,"多元时报",{"id":30,"keyword":31,"url":24,"target_platform":25},22,"LGBT",{"id":33,"keyword":34,"url":24,"target_platform":25},21,"Lesbian",{"id":36,"keyword":37,"url":24,"target_platform":25},7,"跨性别",{"id":39,"keyword":40,"url":24,"target_platform":25},8,"Gay",{"id":42,"keyword":43,"url":24,"target_platform":25},6,"双性恋",{"id":45,"keyword":46,"url":24,"target_platform":25},5,"同性恋",{"id":48,"keyword":49,"url":24,"target_platform":25},4,"新闻",{"id":51,"keyword":52,"url":24,"target_platform":25},3,"酷儿",{"id":54,"keyword":55,"url":24,"target_platform":25},2,"同志",{"id":4,"keyword":57,"url":24,"target_platform":25},"同性",{"id":59,"lanmu_id":60,"tag_ids":61,"type":62,"title":63,"summary":64,"cover":65,"cover_alt":66,"og_image":17,"video_url":17,"video_poster":17,"duration":67,"author":17,"source":17,"source_url":17,"is_reprint":67,"view_count":45,"like_count":67,"publish_time":68,"seo":66,"attrs":69,"images":70,"requested_lang":8,"actual_lang":8,"fallback_used":13,"content":71,"voice":17,"lanmu_name":72,"lanmu_code":73,"tag_names":74},1000795,9,"7","article","英国上诉法院将就工作场所性别指引举行听证","2026年10月，英国英格兰及威尔士上诉法院裁定，就三名原告挑战平等与人权委员会工作场所性别空间临时指引的上诉许可举行口头听证，拟于年内开庭审理以厘清职场权益规范。","\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp",null,0,1792223545,{"voice":17,"share_cover_mobile":17},"[\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp\"]","\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fuploads\u002F20261017\u002F900605c5e3994ce0997512494559fe56.webp\" alt=\"法庭法槌\" style=\"max-width:100%;\">\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:center;color:#999999;\">该图与本文无关，图来源：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pexels.com\u002Fphoto\u002Fjudge-s-gavel-in-courtroom-setting-37726687\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">SHOX ART\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>2026年10月中旬，英国英格兰及威尔士上诉法院正式发布法庭命令，决定就三名个人原告挑战英国平等与人权委员会（Equality and Human Rights Commission，简称 EHRC）临时指引合法性的上诉许可申请举行口头听证。根据上诉法院大法官安德鲁斯（Lady Justice Andrews）签署的审理指令，该听证会将在切实可行的情况下于2026年年底前开庭审理。此项裁定意味着英国司法体系将进一步审查法定机构关于工作场所单一性别设施指导意见的适法性。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>本案起因于平等与人权委员会此前出台的临时指导意见，该指引主张工作场所的卫生间及更衣设施应基于生理性别进行划分。在公益法律组织善法项目（Good Law Project）的支持下，三名当事人对该指引提起司法审查，但英国高等法院于2026年2月作出初审裁决驳回了诉求。原告方在上诉申请中指出，高等法院对英国工作场所健康与安全法规的解释存在法律适用错误，实质上造成了排斥性后果，且未能合理权衡欧洲人权法框架下的公民隐私权与有尊严劳动的基本保障。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>在最新程序处置中，上诉法院虽然驳回了善法项目以机构名义参与上诉的诉讼资格申请，但全面准许三名个人原告进入口头听证程序。针对主审法官认为争议或已被新版业务守则取代的初步观点，原告代理律师团队反驳指出，新守则仅涉及公共服务提供者、公共职能部门及社会团体，而本案核心争端聚焦于受劳动健康法规管辖的工作场所内部设施，相关矛盾依然切实存在。善法项目性少数权益负责人杰斯·奥索姆森（Jess O’Thomson）公开表示，雇主在职场中处于强势地位，强行将当事人隔离至第三方空间不仅构成歧视，更对员工隐私权和生计稳定带来直接风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>分析指出，此举被视为英国围绕单一性别空间界定与性少数劳动权益司法博弈的关键节点。随着《2010年平等法案》在实际执行中面临生理性别定义与性别认同保护条款的持续拉锯，工作场所基本卫生设施的准入规范已成为全英关注的法律焦点。原告方已明确表示，若国内上诉程序未能纠正相关指引，案件将依法上诉至欧洲人权法院，此案的最终司法定性将对英国数万家雇主的劳动合规指引与反歧视标准产生深远制度影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align:right;\">欧洲编辑部：卢卡斯·巴克尔\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">来源：综合英国英格兰及威尔士上诉法院、英国高等法院及 Good Law Project 通报\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>资料来源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英国高等法院司法审查判决档案（Judgments - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, [2026] EWHC 279 (Admin)）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.judiciary.uk\u002Fjudgments\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.judiciary.uk\u002Fjudgments\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英国平等与人权委员会单一性别设施业务指南（Equality and Human Rights Commission - Guidance on Single-Sex Spaces）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.equalityhumanrights.com\u002Fen\u002Fguidance\u002Fsingle-sex-spaces\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.equalityhumanrights.com\u002Fen\u002Fguidance\u002Fsingle-sex-spaces\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n\u003Cp>英国国家法律数据库《2010年平等法案》（Legislation.gov.uk - Equality Act 2010）：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.legislation.gov.uk\u002Fukpga\u002F2010\u002F15\u002Fcontents\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"text-decoration:none;\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.legislation.gov.uk\u002Fukpga\u002F2010\u002F15\u002Fcontents\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\r\n","欧洲","lanmu_9",{"7":75},"焦点"]